BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Matuszewski Paweł (Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw)
Selective Exposure on Polish Political and News Media Facebook Pages
Polish Sociological Review, 2019, nr 2, s. 177-197, rys., tab., aneks, bibliogr. 74 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Polityka, Preferencje, Media społecznościowe
Politics, Preferences, Social media
Increasing numbers of citizens rely on social media to gather both political and non-political information. This fact raises questions about belief formation and belief updating in the social media setting. Using Facebook data on users' behaviour in Poland in 2017, I test the hypothesis that individuals tend to like content that confirms their beliefs. I measure the political preferences of nearly 1.4 million users who were active on the main political and news media pages and classify them as being supporters of certain political organisations or as being politically unaffiliated. Based on the principles of analytical sociology, I construct a theoretical model that may explain the results. According to the model, users tend to like posts from only one source of information. There are also statistically significant differences in the news media preferences of supporters of different political organisations. They are prone to like posts published by sources that accord with their views. The model also correctly predicts that politically unaffiliated users choose media outlets that are considered unbiased or less biased. The results support the hypothesis that users of social media prefer exclusive or near-exclusive sources of information. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Pełny tekst
  1. Albert, J. 2009. Bayesian Computation with R. New York: Springer.
  2. An, J., Quercia, D., & Crowcroft, J. 2013. Fragmented social media: A look into selective exposure to political news. Presented on: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion.
  3. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook, Science 348 (6239): 1130-1132.
  4. Barberá, P. 2015. How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S., Working paper.
  5. Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. 2015. Tweeting From Left to Right Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? Psychological Science 1531-1542.
  6. Beam, M. A., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. 2018. Facebook news and (de)polarization: reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Downloaded 20.07.2018, from
  7. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Boudon, R. 1989. Subjective Rationality and the Explanation of Social Behaviour, Rationality and Society 1 (2):173-196.
  9. Boudon, R. 1997. The Art of Self-Persuasion: The Social Explanation of False Beliefs. Cambridge, England; Malden, Mass.: Polity.
  10. Boudon, R. 1998. Limitations od Rational Choice Theory, American Journal of Sociology 104 (3): 817-828.
  11. Boudon, R. 2001. The Origins of Values. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  12. Boudon, R. 2011. Ordinary rationality: the core of analytical sociology, in: P. Demeulenaere (ed.), Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-49.
  13. Building a Better News Feed for You | Facebook Newsroom. (2016). Downloaded 26.07.2017, from
  14. Cherkaoui, M. 2014. From positivism to generative mechanisms: Raymond Boudon's path-breaking research programme, Papers. Revista de Sociologia 99 (4): 451-468.
  15. Dalton, R. J. 2013. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties In Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, D.C: CQ Press.
  16. Di Maggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. 1996. Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized? American Journal of Sociology 102 (3): 690-755.
  17. Dixit, A. K., & Weibull, J. W. 2007. Political polarization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (18): 7351-7356.
  18. Elster, J. 2009. Emotions, in: The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 51-71.
  19. Elster, J. 2015. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Europe Internet Usage Stats Facebook Subscribers and Population Statistics. 2017. Downloaded 19-03-2018, from
  21. Feliksiak, M. 2017. Media online. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
  22. Festinger, L. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  23. Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. 2016. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption, Public Opinion Quarterly 80: 298-320.
  24. Flecha, R., Gómez, J., & Puigvert, L. 2003. Contemporary Sociological Theory. New York: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers.
  25. Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. 2013. Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Gambetta, D. 2005. Concatenations of mechanisms, in: P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach of Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102-124.
  27. Garrett, R. K. 2009. Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate, Journal of Communication 59 (4): 676-699.
  28. Guess, A. M. 2016. Media Choice and Moderation: Evidence from Online Tracking Data. Downloaded from
  29. Hamlin, C. L. 2002. Beyond Relativism: Raymond Boudon, Cognitive Rationality, and Critical Realism. London: Routledge.
  30. Harmon-Jones, E. 2012. A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on the role of emotion in the maintenance and change of beliefs and attitudes, in: N. Frijda (ed.), Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185-212.
  31. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. 2009. Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information, Psychological Bulletin 135 (4): 555-588.
  32. Hedström, P., & Bearman, P. 2009. What is analytical Sociology all about? An Introductory Essay, in: P. Hedström & P. Bearman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-24.
  33. Hedström, P., & Udehn, L. 2009. Analytical Sociology and Theories of the Middle Range, in: P. Hedström & P. Bearman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 25-47.
  34. Hunter, J. D. 1992. Culture Wars: The Struggle To Control The Family, Art, Education, Law, And Politics in America. Memphis, Tenn.: Basic Books.
  35. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. 2009. Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use, Journal of Communication 59 (1): 19-39.
  36. Jacobson, S., Myung, E., & Johnson, S. L. 2016. Open media or echo chamber: the use of links in audience discussions on the Facebook Pages of partisan news organizations, Information, Communication & Society 19 (7): 875-891.
  37. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. 1987. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing, Psychological Review 94 (2): 211-228.
  38. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. 2015. Choice and Preference in Media Use: Advances in Selective Exposure Theory and Research. New York, London: Routledge.
  39. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Kleinman, S. B. 2012. Preelection Selective Exposure: Confirmation Bias Versus Informational Utility, Communication Research 39 (2): 170-193.
  40. Kruglanski, A. W. 1989. Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge. Boston, MA: Springer US. Downloaded from
  41. Kruglanski, A. W. 1999. Motivation, cognition, and reality: Three memos for the next generation of research, Psychological Inquiry 10 (1): 54-58.
  42. Kruschke, J. 2014. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis, Second Edition: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  43. Kwiatkowska, A., Cześnik, M., Żerkowska-Balas, M., & Stanley, B. 2016. Ideologiczna treść wymiaru lewica-prawica w Polsce w latach 1997-2015, Studia Socjologiczne 4 (223).
  44. Lasswell, H. D. 1941. Democracy Through Public Opinion. New York: Bantam.
  45. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. 1948. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
  46. Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis, in: M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. Page (eds.), Freedom and control in modern society. New York: Van Nostrand, pp. 18-66.
  47. Levy, M. R. 1987. VCR use and the concept of audience activity, Communication Quarterly 35 (3): 267-275.
  48. Li, R., & Suh, A. 2015. Factors Influencing Information credibility on Social Media Platforms: Evidence from Facebook Pages, Procedia Computer Science 72]/ (Supplement C): 314-328.
  49. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Maes, M., & Bischofberger, L. 2015. Will the Personalization of Online Social Networks Foster Opinion Polarization? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2553436). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Downloaded from
  51. Manzo, G. 2014. Reason-based explanations and analytical sociology. A rejoinder to Boudon, Papers. Revista de Sociologia 99 (4): 529-551.
  52. Matuszewski, P. 2018a. Cyberplemiona. Analiza zachowań użytkowników Facebooka w trakcie kampanii parlamentarnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  53. Matuszewski, P. 2018b. Use of the news media for a political discussion on Facebook, Studia Medioznawcze 1 (72): 27-42.
  54. McKnight, D. H., & Kacmar, C. J. 2007. Factors and Effects of Information Credibility, in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 423-432.
  55. Merton, R. K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science The reward and communication systems of science are considered, Science 159 (3810): 56-63.
  56. Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. 2014. Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online, Communication Research 41 (8): 1042-1063.
  57. Mutz, D. C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  58. News Feed FYI: Using Qualitative Feedback to Show Relevant Stories | Facebook Newsroom. Downloaded 26-07-2017, from
  59. Pariser, E. 2012. The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You. London: Penguin.
  60. Quattrociocchi, W., Scala, A., & Sunstein, C. R. 2016. Echo Chambers on Facebook (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2795110). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Downloaded from
  61. Rydgren, J. 2009. Beliefs, in: P. Hedström & P. Bearman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 72-93.
  62. Schmidt, A. L., Zollo, F., Vicario, M. D., Bessi, A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., ... Quattrociocchi, W. 2017. Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (12): 3035-3039.
  63. Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. 1967. Selective exposure to information: a critical review, Public Opinion Quarterly 31 (2): 194-213.
  64. Shearer, E., & Gottfrie d, J. 2017. News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017. Downloaded 19-03-2018, from
  65. Simon, H. A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment, Psychological Review 63 (2): 129-138.
  66. Slater, M. 2007. Reinforcing Spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behaviour and social identity, Communication Theory 17: 281-303.
  67. Stroud, N. J. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice (1st edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
  68. Sunstein, C. R. 2001. Echo Chambers: Bush V. Gore, Impeachment, and Beyond. Princeton University Press.
  69. Sunstein, C. R. 2009. 2.0. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  70. Sunstein, C. R. 2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  71. Sztompka, P. 2007. Zaufanie: fundament społeczeństwa. Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak.
  72. Visser, P., Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. 2008. Knowledge and Attitudes, in: W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 127-140.
  73. Weeks, B. E., Ksiazek, T. B., & Holbert, R. L. 2016. Partisan Enclaves or Shared Media Experiences? A Network Approach to Understanding Citizens' Political News Environments, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60 (2): 248-268.
  74. Wells, C., Reedy, J., Gastil, J., & Lee, C. 2009. Information Distortion and Voting Choices: The Origins and Effects of Factual Beliefs in Initiative Elections, Political Psychology 30 (6): 953-969.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu