BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Jasiecki Krzysztof (University of Warsaw)
Tytuł
A Reconfiguration of the Interest Representation System in the European Union
Źródło
Polish Sociological Review, 2019, nr 2, s. 123-140, bibliogr. 64 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Grupa interesu
Interest group
Uwagi
summ.
Firma/Organizacja
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstrakt
Interest groups are one of the main types of representation which mediate between public opinion and decision-making processes in the EU. The crisis of global capitalism and the crisis of liberal democracy as well as the accumulation of crises in the EU have shaped system of representing interests in a new way. The article features the latest changes in this system including the intermediary institutions activity conditions in the Member States and in the EU. Since the 2008 crisis, populist and authoritarian politicians, both "right-wing" and "left-wing," have questioned the current system. In this context key aspects of the weakness of representation of interests in Central and Eastern Europe are presented. They result from the overlap of the global crises into the specific problems of the post-communist "dependent market economies." In conclusion, some theoretical limitations of research on the representation of interests in the EU and the possibility of overcoming them are being discussed. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. A Dangerous Waltz. 2018a. The Economist (February 3rd): 11-12, 17-19.
  2. Albright, M. 2018. Fascism. A Warning. New York: HarperCollins.
  3. Aspen Reviev Central Europe 2017, 2.
  4. Aux armes, citoyens. 2018b, The Economist December 1st: 85.
  5. Bluhm, K., Varga, M. 2019. New Conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe. London, New York: Routledge.
  6. Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe's Periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  7. Castells, M. 2012. Networks of outrage and hope-social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  8. Chapman, A. 2017. Pluralism Under Attack: The Assault on Press Freedom in Poland. New York: Freedom House.
  9. Crouch, C. 2011. The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  10. Czachór, Z. D. 2015. Impact of the Global Crises on the Crises in the European Union. A Critical Analysis, in: B. J. Góralczyk (ed.), European Union on the Global Scene: United or Irrelevant? Warszawa: University of Warsaw.
  11. Eising, R. 2007. Interest Groups and the European Union, in: M. Cini (ed.), European Union Politics. Oxford: University Press.
  12. Farkas, B. 2016. Models of Capitalism in the European Union. Post-crisis Perspectives. London: Palgrave.
  13. Ferguson, N. 2005. Colossus. The Rise and Fall of the American Empire. New York: Penguin Books.
  14. Ferguson, N. 2012. The Great Degeneration. New York: Penguin Books.
  15. Gagatek, W. 2015. The Economic and Financial Crises in the Light of Theories of European Integration, in: B. J. Góralczyk (ed.), European Union on the Global Scene: United or Irrelevant? Warszawa: University of Warsaw.
  16. Gorzelak, G., Goh, Ch.Ch. 2010. Financial Crisis in Central and Eastern Europe: From Similarity to Diversity. Warszawa: Scholar.
  17. Greenwood, J. 2007. Interest representation in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Grosse, T. G. 2015. A Potential for Revolution in Europe?, in: B. J. Góralczyk (ed.), European Union on the Global Scene: United or Irrelevant? Warszawa: University of Warsaw.
  19. Grzymała-Busse, A. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan. Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Grosse, T.G. 2016. Tragedia państw peryferyjnych, czyli o geopolitycznych dylematach Polski w Unii Europejskiej, in: T. Zarycki (ed.), Polska jako peryferie. Warszawa: Scholar.
  21. Hall, P. A., Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: University Press.
  22. Hass, R. 2018. How a World Order Ends. And What Comes in Its Wake, Foreign Affairs: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-12-11/how-world-order-ends.
  23. Held, D. 2006. Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  24. Hix, S. 2005. The Political System of the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmilian.
  25. Inglehart, R. F., Norris, P. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Harvard: Harvard Kennedy School.
  26. Inotai, A. 2017. Is Visegrad-4 Countries Future in the European Union Questionable? Yearbook of Polish European Studies 20: 85-100.
  27. Jasiecki, K. 2008. The Europeanization of Polish Democracy, Polish Sociological Review 4: 359-382.
  28. Jasiecki, K. 2016. Nowa peryferyjność w perspektywie różnorodności kapitalizmu. Przykład posocjalistycznych państw Unii Europejskiej, in: T. Zarycki (ed.), Polska jako peryferie. Warszawa: Scholar.
  29. King, L., Szelenyi, I. 2005. Post-Communist Economic Systems, in: N.J. Smelser, R. Swedberg (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2005.
  30. Kohler-Koch, B., Quittkat, Ch., Kurczewska, U. 2013. Interest Intermediation in the European Union Revisited. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.
  31. Kurczewska, U. 2016. Organizacje biznesu w Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: SGH.
  32. Kurczewska, U., Jasiecki, K. 2017. Reprezentacje interesów polskich organizacji biznesu w Unii Europejskiej - nowe wyzwania i ograniczenia, in: U. Kurczewska, K. Jasiecki (ed.), Reprezentacja interesów gospodarczych i społecznych. Warszawa: University of Warsaw.
  33. Marczewska-Rytko, M., Aksiuto, K., Maj, D., Pomarański, M. 2018. Civic Participation in the Visegrad Group Countries after 1989. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.
  34. Mounk, Y. 2018. The People vs Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  35. Müller, J. w. 2017. What is Populism? Pennsylvania: Penn Press.
  36. Myant, M. 2018. The Limits to Dependent Growth in East-Central Europe, Revue de la regulation (Autum), https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/13351?lang=en.
  37. Myant, M., Drahokoupil, J. 2011. Transition Economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Hoboken: Wiley & Sons.
  38. Nölke, A. 2017. Brexit: Towards a New Global Phase of Organized Capitalism, Competition & Change 3 (21): 1-12.
  39. Nölke, A., Vliegenhart, A. 2009. Enlarging The Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe, World Politics 61 (4): 670-702.
  40. Oxfam. 2018. Reward Work, Not Wealth. https://d1tn3vj7xz9fdh.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/file attachments/bp-reward-work-not-wealth-220118-en.pdf.
  41. Pakulski, J. 2016. The Visegrad Countries in Crisis. Warsaw: Collegium Civitas.
  42. Rachman, G. 2018. The Great Political Divide, in: The World in 2019. The Economist: 72.
  43. Revue de la regulation. 2018 (Autumn).
  44. Rodrik, D. 2011. The Globalization Paradox. New York: Norton & Company.
  45. Rodrik, D. 2018. Populism and the Economics of Globalization. Journal of International Business Policy: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/populismandtheeconomicsofglobalization.pdf.
  46. Runciman, D., Brito Veira, M. 2008. Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  47. Saward, M. 2003. Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  48. Scharpf, F. W. 2009. The Asymmetry of European Integration or why the EU cannot be a "Social Market Economy." Berlin: Free University.
  49. Scharpf, F. W. 2016. De-Constitutionalization and Majority Rule. A Democratic Vision for Europe. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  50. Snyder, T. 2016. Sami nie rozumiecie, co tracicie, Gazeta Wyborcza (14-15.05.): 14-15.
  51. Stępniewski, T. 2018. Inicjatywa Trójmorza: uwarunkowania geopolityczne i nowy model regionalnej współpracy, Studia Europejskie 22 (2): 33-43.
  52. Tomšič, M. 2017. Decline of elite consensus and destabilisation of political space in East-Central Europe, Corvinus Journal Of Sociology And Social Policy 3S (8): 151-170.
  53. Trappmann, V., Jasiecki, K., Przybysz, D. 2014. Institutions or attitudes? The role of formal worker representation in labour relations, in: K. Bluhm, B. Martens, V. Trappmann (eds.), Business Leaders and New Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Europe. New York, London: Routledge.
  54. Ukielski, P. 2018. Inicjatywa Trójmorza w polskiej polityce zagranicznej, Studia Europejskie 22 (2): 45-58.
  55. Van Schendelen, R. 2002. Machiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  56. Varoufakis, Y. 2013. The Global Minotaur: America, Europe and the Future of Global Economy. London: Zed Books.
  57. Varoufakis, Y. 2017. Adults in the Room. London: The Bodley Head.
  58. Wallerstein, I. 2003. The Decline of American Power. New York: The New Press.
  59. Webber, D. 2014. How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives, European Journal of International Relations 20 (2): 342-365.
  60. Welz, Ch., Fromm, A., Rodriguez Contreras, R., Boehmer, S. 2016. Mapping key dimensions of industrial relations. Dublin: Eurofound.
  61. Yarhi-Milo, K. 2018. After Credibility. American Foreign Policy in the Trump Era, Foreign Affairs January/February: 68-77.
  62. Zakaria, F. 2009. The Post-American World and the Rise of the Rest. New York: Penguin Books.
  63. Zielonka, J. 2014. Is the EU Doomed? Cambridge: Polity Press.
  64. Zielonka, J. 2018. Counter-Revolution. Liberal Europe in Retreat. Oxford: University Press.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1231-1413
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.26412/psr206.01
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu