BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Konecki Krzysztof T. (University of Lodz, Poland)
Tytuł
How the University Organizational Culture Is Being Experienced? Phenomenological Studies of Experiencing the Here and Now of the Organization
Źródło
Polish Sociological Review, 2017, nr 4, s. 485-504, rys., tab., bibliogr. 38 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Kultura organizacyjna, Relacje międzyludzkie, Szkolnictwo wyższe
Organisational culture, Interpersonal relations, Higher education
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
This paper undertakes the issue of how the organizational culture of a certain institution is being experienced by reconstructing the leading themes coming from auto-observation and descriptions of it. Still, instead of investigating how it is perceived or how its values are verbalized, the study referring to the actual experiencing of certain spaces, social relations, as well as how these are being conceptually embraced therein has been undertaken. To do so, phenomenological methodology and the analysis of qualitative data-adjusted to the research framework at hand-have been employed. Throughout the observation of bodily and mind responses, the lived experience under scrutiny has been given a leading role in regards to determining whether and how the research preconceptualizations should be superseded by the perceptions of the organizational reality under study, as seen and experienced by those who actively partake in the institution at hand. This research refers to how the University is being experienced by the students of one of its degree courses. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Ashkanasy, N. M. 2003. Emotions in Organizations: A Multi-Level Perspective, in: Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Strategy (Research in Multi Level Issues, vol. 2), edited by F. Dansereau and F. J. Yammarino. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 9-54.
  2. Bentz, V. M. & Shapiro, J. J. 1998. Mindful Inquiry in Social Research. London: Sage.
  3. Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Chatman, J. & O ' Reilly, Charles A. 2016. Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture, Research in Organizational Behavior 36: 199-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.004
  5. Churchill, S. D. & Wertz, F. J. 1985. An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology for Consumer Research: Historical, Conceptual, and Methodological Foundations, in: NA -Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 12, edited by E. C. Hirschman and M. B. Holbrook. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 550-555.
  6. Danziger, N., Rachman - Moore, D. & Valency, R. 2008. The Construct Validity of Schein's Career Anchors Orientation Inventory, Career Development International 13(1): 7-19.
  7. Depraz, N. 2002. What About the Praxis of Reduction? Between Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, in: T. Toadvine and L. Embree (eds.), Merleau-Ponty's Reading of Husserl. Dorchester, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 115-126.
  8. Englander, M. 2016. The Phenomenological Method in Qualitative Psychology and Psychiatry, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 11. Retrieved June 28, 2016 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30682).
  9. Fineman, S. 2000. Emotion in Organizations. London: Sage.
  10. Flaherty, M. G. 1987. Multiple Realities and Time Duration, The Sociological Quarterly 28(3): 313-326.
  11. Flaherty, M. G. 1991. The Perception of Time and Situated Engrossment, Social Psychology Quarterly 54(1): 76-85.
  12. Giorgi, A. 1970. Psychology as a Human Science: A Phenomenologically Based Approach. New York: Harper and Row.
  13. Groenewald, T. 2004. A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 3(1). Retrieved December 20, 2015 (http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3 1/pdf/ groenewald.pdf).
  14. Hatch, M. J. 1993. The Dynamics of Organizational Culture, Academy of Management Review 18(4): 657-693.
  15. Hatch, M. J. 2002. The Dynamics of Organizational Identity, Human Relations 55(8): 989-1018.
  16. Hofstede, G. 2001. Cultures consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
  17. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. 2005. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  18. Husserl, E. 1970. Logical Investigations, New York: Humanities Press. (Originally published in 1900)
  19. Husserl, E. [1954] 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  20. Hycner, R. K. 1985. Some Guidelines for the Phenomenological Analysis of Interview Data, Human Studies 8(3): 279-303.
  21. Kelle, U. 2005. "Emergence" vs. "Forcing" of Empirical Data? A crucial problem of "Grounded Theory" Reconsidered, Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(2).
  22. Kenealy, G. 2008. Management Research and Grounded Theory: A Review of Grounded Theory Building Approach in Organisational and Management Research, The Grounded Theory Review 7(2): 95-117.
  23. Kociatkiewicz, J., & Kostera, M. 2015. Into the Labyrinth: Tales of Organizational Nomadism. Organization Studies 36(1): 55-71.
  24. Konecki, K. T. 1994. Kultura organizacyjna japońskich przedsiębiorstw. Studium socjologiczne [The Organizational Cultures of Japanese Enterprises. A Sociological Study]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  25. Leder, D. 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  26. Martin, P. Y. & Turner, B. A. 1986. Grounded Theory and Organizational Research, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences 22: 141-157.
  27. Merleau - Ponty, M. 2005. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
  28. Michalak, J., & Ristino, R. 2013. A Phenomenological Study of Employee Perceptions of Managerial Behaviors as Personal Enactments of Organizational Culture, Journal of Intercultural Management 5(3): 63-73.
  29. Pearse, N., and Kanyangale, M. 2009. Researching Organizational Culture Using the Grounded Theory Method, The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 7(67-74): available online at www.ejbrm.com
  30. Rehorick, D. A., & Bentz, V. M. 2008. Transformative Phenomenology. Changing Ourselves, Lifeworlds, and Professional Practice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  31. Schein, E. H. 2010. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  32. Schütz, A. [1932]1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  33. Schütz, A. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  34. Seamon, D. 2000. A Way of Seeing People and Place: Phenomenology in Environment-Behavior Research, in: S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto, and H. Minami (eds.), Theoretical Perspectives in Environment- Behavior Research. New York: Plenum, pp. 157-178.
  35. Simpson, S. 2008. Experiencing Phenomenology as Mindful Transformation. An Autobiographical Account, in: D. A. Rehorick and V. M. Bentz (eds.), Transformative Phenomenology. Changing Ourselves, Lifeworlds, and Professional Practice. New York: Lexington Books, pp. 51-65.
  36. Toombs, K. S. 1995. The Lived Experience of Disability. Human Studies (18): 9-23.
  37. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, Ch. 1993. The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Sweden, and the Netherlands. New York: Currency Doubleday.
  38. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, Ch. 1998. Riding the Waves of Culture. Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1231-1413
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu