BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Turska-Kawa Agnieszka (University of Silesia in Katowice), Wojtasik Waldemar (University of Silesia in Katowice)
Tytuł
"Directiveness" as a Predictor of Religious Attitudes
Źródło
Polish Sociological Review, 2017, nr 2, s. 189-201, tab., rys., bibliogr. 65 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Religia, Religie chrześcijańskie, Postawy społeczne
Religion, Christian religions, Social attitudes
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
This paper examines the relation between "directiveness" and levels of religiosity (conceptualized as the three dimensions of "closing-opening," "clericalization-secularization," and "dogmatism-permissiveness"). The model used has been empirically verified and is a consequence of previous studies proving that religiosity in itself generates both pro-social attitudes (especially in regard to an individual's own religious group) and attitudes of aggression toward "outgroups." Researchers have also demonstrated that religion can be a factor that inhibits actual aggression through values such as self-control of negative emotions or impulsive acts. This study finds that the model presented is statistically significant in terms of dimensions such as "closing-opening" and clericalization- secularization: higher directiveness makes it possible to predict higher "closing" and clericalization. This finding makes it possible to discuss directiveness as a foundation for real aggression and attitudes of discrimination against individuals or groups that pose a symbolic or real threat to the unity of the Roman Catholic community. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Adorno, T. W. 2010. Osobowość autorytarna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, N. R. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
  3. Alford, H. 2009. How to Live: A Search for Wisdom from Old People while They Are Still on This Earth. New York: Twelve Books.
  4. Allport, G. W. 1950. The Individual and His Religion: a Psychological Interpretation. London: Macmillan Pub Co.
  5. Allport, G. W. 1966. The Religious Context of Prejudice, Journal for The Scientific Study of Religion 53: 447- 457.
  6. Altemeyer, B., Hunsberger, B. 1992. Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 22: 113-133.
  7. Argyle, M., Beit-Hallahmi, B. 1975. The Social Psychology of Religion. London: Routledge.
  8. Azzi, C., Ehrenberg, R. 1975. Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance, Journal of Political Economy 831: 27-56.
  9. Batson, D. C., Floyd, R. B., Meyer, J. M., Winner, A. L. 1999. And Who is My Neighbor?: Intrinsic Religion as a Source of Universal Compassion, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 384: 445-57.
  10. Blicharz, J. 2012. Administracja publiczna i społeczeństwo obywatelskie w państwie prawa. Wrocław: Prace naukowe WPAiE Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
  11. Blogowska, J., Lambert, C., Saroglou, V. 2013. Religious Prosociality and Aggression: It's Real, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (3): 524-536.
  12. Boguszewski, R. 2014. (Nie) religijna moralność katolików w Polsce, Zeszyty Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego 1 (57): 123-139.
  13. Bourdieu, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital, in: J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  14. Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and literature, edited by R. Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press.
  15. Brzozowski, P. 1997. Skala dyrektywności Johna J. Raya. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
  16. Burke, P. 2009. Kultura ludowa we wczesnonowożytnej Europie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  17. CBOS [Social Opinion Research Center]. 2012. BS/130. Społeczne postawy wobec wyznawców rożnych religii.
  18. CBOS. 2014. BS/60, Aktywność społeczna Polaków.
  19. CBOS. BS/3/2014. Religijność polskiej wsi.
  20. CBOS. 2015. BS/29/2015. Kanon wiary Polaków.
  21. Cox, E. 1967. Sixth form religion: A report sponsored by the Christian Education Movement.
  22. Danso, H., Hunsberger, B., Pratt, M. 1997. The Role of Parental Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism in Child-rearing Goals and Practices, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36 (4): 496-511
  23. Deaton, A. S. 2009. Aging, Religion, and Health, Princeton University: https://www.princeton.edu/~deaton/ downloads/Religion_and_Health_All_August09.pdf.
  24. Fukuyama, F. 1997. Zaufanie: kapitał społeczny a droga do dobrobytu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  25. Fukuyama, F. 2000. Kapitał społeczny, in: L. E. Harrison, S. P. Huntington (eds.), Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, Polish Edition, Kultura ma znaczenie. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
  26. Galen, L. W. 2012. Does Religious belief Promote Pro-sociality? A Critical Examination, Psychological Bulletin 138 (5): 876-906.
  27. Garai, J. E., Scheinfeld, A. 1968. Sex Differences in Mental and Behavioral Traits, Genetic Psychology Monographs 77:169-299.
  28. George, R. P. 2014. The Clash of Orthodoxies: Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis. Open Road Media.
  29. Gray, J. A. 1971. Sex Differences in Emotional Behaviour in Mammals Including Man: Endocrine Bases, Acta Psychologica 35 (1): 29-46.
  30. Greenberg, A. 2000. The Church and the Revitalization of Politics and the Community, Political Science Quarterly 115 (3): 377-394.
  31. Harris, F. C. 1994. Something Within: Religion as a Mobilizer of African-American Political Activism, Journal of Politics 56 (1): 42-68.
  32. Hill, P. C., Williamson, W. P. 2005. The Psychology of Religious Fundamentalism. New York: Guilford.
  33. Hunsberger, B., Alisat, S., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. 1996. Religious Fundamentalism and Religious Doubts: Content, Connections, and Complexity of Thinking, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 6 (3): 201-220.
  34. Iannaccone, L. R. 1994. Why Strict Churches are Strong, American Journal of Sociology 99: 1180-1211.
  35. Jackson, L. M., Esses, V. M. 1997. Of Scripture and Ascription: The Relation between Religious Fundamentalism and Intergroup Helping, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (8): 893-906.
  36. Jakubowska, U. 1999. Preferencje polityczne. Psychologiczne teorie i badania. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN.
  37. Jones-Correa, M. A., Leal, D. L. 2001. Political Participation: Does Religion Matter?, Political Research Quarterly 54 (4): 751-770.
  38. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., Sulloway, F. J. 2003. Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition, Psychological Bulletin 129 (3): 339-375.
  39. Leege, D. C. 1993. Religion and Politics in Theoretical Perspective, in: D. C. Leege, L. A. Kellstedt (eds.), Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
  40. Mariański, J. 2013. Kościół katolicki w Polsce w przestrzeni życia publicznego. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  41. McCullough, M. E., Willoughby, B. L. B. 2009. Religion, Self-Regulation, and Self-Control: Associations, Explanations, and Implications, Psychological Bulletin 135 (1): 69-93.
  42. Mika, S. 1981. Psychologia społeczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  43. Miller, A. S., Hoffmann. J. P. 1995. Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34 (1): 63-75.
  44. Miller, A. S., Stark, R. 2002. Gender and Religiousness: Can Socialization Explanations be Saved?, American Journal of Sociology 107 (6): 1399-1423.
  45. Musick, M. A., Wilson, J. 2008. Volunteers: A Social Profile. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  46. Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F. .2008. The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality, Science 322 (5898): 58-62.
  47. Norris, P., Inglehart, R. 2011. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. Peck, M. S. 2012. The Road less Travelled. New York: Random House.
  49. Pichon, I., Saroglou, V. 2009. Religion and Helping: Impact of Target Thinking Styles and Just-World Beliefs, Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (2): 215-236.
  50. Preston, J. L., Salomon, E., Ritter, R. S. 2013. Religious Prosociality. Religion, Personality, and Social Behaviour, in: V. Saroglou (ed.), Religion, Personality, and Social Behaviour. New York: Psychology Press.
  51. Prusowski, W. 2009. Najbardziej charakterystyczne cechy polskiej religijności - analiza pastoralna, Warszawskie Studia Pastoralne 7: 182-201.
  52. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  53. Putnam, R. D. 2003. Better Together. Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  54. Ray, J. J. 1976. Do Authoritarians hold Authoritarian Attitudes?, Human Relations 29: 307-325.
  55. Rokeach, M. 1960. The Open and Closed Mind. Oxford: Basic Books.
  56. Rowatt, W. C., 'LaBouff, J., Johnson, M., Froese, P, Tsang, J.-A. 2009. Associations among Religiousness, Social Attitudes, and Prejudice in a national random sample of American Adults, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 11: 14-24.
  57. Saraglou, V. 2012. Is Religion not Prosocial at all? Comment on Galen, Psychological Bulletin 138 (5): 907-12.
  58. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D. 2003. Pathways to Political Participation? Religion, Communication contexts, and Mass Media, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21 (3): 300-324.
  59. Smith, J. 1985. Manhunt. Eastbourne: Kingsway.
  60. Stawrowski, Z. 2004. Konserwatyzm a religia chrześcijańska, in: P. Mazurkiewicz, S. Sowiński (eds.), Religia i konserwatyzm: sprzymierzeńcy czy konkurenci? Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Ossolineum.
  61. Uslaner, E. M. 2000. Producing and Consuming Trust, Political Science Quarterly 115 (4): 569-590.
  62. Whilley, Jr, B. E. 2009. Religiosity and Attitudes toward Lesbians and Gay Men: A Meta-analysis, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 19(1): 21-38.
  63. Wojtasik, W. 2013. Functions of Elections in Democratic Systems, Political Preferences 4: 25-38.
  64. Wuthnow, R. 1999. Mobilizing Civic Engagement: The Changing Impact of Religious Involvement, in: T. Skocpol, M. P. Fiorina (eds.), Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington: Brookings/Russell Sage.
  65. Zaccaro, S. J., Foti, R. J., Kenny, D. A. 1991. Self-Monitoring and Trait-based variance in Leadership: An Investigation of Leader Flexibility across Multiple Group Situations, Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (2): 308-315.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1231-1413
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu