BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Wenzel Michał (University of Social Sciences and Humanities)
Media Effects on Support for European Integration in Old and New EU Member States
Polish Sociological Review, 2015, nr 2, s. 153-169, tab., bibliogr. 27 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Opinia publiczna, Integracja gospodarcza i polityczna Europy, Media
Public opinion, Economic and political integration of Europe, Media
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
The study measures the strength of media effects on attitudes to EU integration.Media exposure is the independent variable; support for European integration is the dependent variable; socio-economic conditions and cognitive-cultural variables are contextual variables. The analysis covers 27 EU member states at the time of 2009 EP election. Both micro-level variables and country-level effects were taken into consideration in hierarchical linear models. Data from the PIREDEU study was used. Analyses document weak influence of media exposure on attitudes. The overall positive effect is mostly concentrated in stable democracies with well-developed media systems.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
  1. Allport, G. W. 1935. Attitudes, in: C. Murchison (ed .), A Handbook of Social Psychology. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press
  2. Azrout, R., van Spanje, J. and de Vreese, C. 2012. When News matters: Media Effects on Public Support for European Union Enlargement in 21 countries, Journal of Common Market Studies 50(5): 691-708.
  3. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. and Stokes, D. E. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
  4. Chong, D. and Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies, Amer-ican Political Science Review 4: 663-680.
  5. Converse, P. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics, in: D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206-261.
  6. De Vreese, C. H. and Boomgaarden, H. G. 2006. Media Message Flows and Interpersonal Communication: The Conditional Nature of Effects on Public Opinion, Communication Research 33(1): 19-37.
  7. De Vreese, C. H., Boomgarden, H. G. and Semetko, H. A. 2011. (In)direct Framing Effects: The Effects of News Media Framing on Public Support for Turkish Membership in the European Union, Communication Research 38(2): 179-205.
  8. De Vreese, C. and Boomgarden, H. G. 2003. Valenced News Frames and Public Support for the EU, Communications 28: 361-381.
  9. Donsbach, W. and Traugott, M. (eds.). 2008. The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: Sage.
  10. Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Journal of Communication 43(4): 51-58.
  11. Fazio, R. H. 1990. Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The MODE Model as an Integrative Framework, in: M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 75-109.
  12. Goldman, S. K. and Mutz, D. C. 2011. The Friendly Media Phenomenon: A Cross-National Analysis of Cross-cutting Exposure, Political Communication 28(1): 42-66.
  13. Jankowski, N. W. and Van Selm, M. 2000. The Promise and Practice of Public Debate in Cyberspace, in: K. Hacker, and J. van Dijk (eds.), Digital Democracy. Issues of Theory and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 149-165.
  14. Maier, J. and Rittberger, B. 2008. Shifting Europe's Boundaries: Mass Media, Public Opinion and the Enlargement of the EU, European Union Politics 9(2): 243-67.
  15. Matthes, J. and Schemer, C. 2012. Diachronic Framing Effects in Competitive Opinion Environments. Political Communication 29(3): 319-339.
  16. McLaren, L. M. 2002. Public Support for the European Union: Cost/benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat?, Journal of Politics 64(2): 551-66.
  17. Roessler, P. 2008. Agenda-setting, Framing and Priming, in: W. Donsbach, and M. Traugott (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: Sage, pp. 205-217.
  18. Shah, D. V., Cho, J. Eveland, W. P. and Kwak, N. 2005. Information and Expression in a Digital Age: modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation, Communication Research 32(5): 531-565.
  19. Schmitt, H. and Thommassen, J. (eds.). 1999. Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Schuck, A., Xezonakis, G., Banducci, S. and de Vreese, C. H. 2010. EES (2009) Media Study Data Advance Release Documentation, 31/03/2010 (
  21. Schuck, A., Xezonakis, G., Elenbaas, M., Banducci, S. A. and de Vreese, C. H. 2011. Party Contestation and Europe on the News Agenda: the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections, Electoral Studies 30: 41-52.
  22. Semetko, H. A., Vander Brug, W. and Valkenburg, P. M. 2003. The Influence of Political Events on Attitudes towards the European Union, British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 621-634.
  23. Tourengau, R., Rips, L. J. and Rasinski, K. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Visser, P. S., Holbrook, A. and Krosnick, J. A. 2008. Knowledge and Attitudes, in: W. Donsbach, and M. Traugott (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: Sage, pp. 123-140.
  25. Vliegenthart, R., Schuck, A.R.T., Boomgarden, H.G. and de Vreese, C. H. 2008. News Coverage and Support for European Integration, 1990-2006, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(4): 415-439.
  26. Wenzel, M. and Feliksiak, M. 2012. Wpływ internetu na głosowanie w wyborach parlamentarnych 2011 roku, Studia Socjologiczne 4 (240): 133-155.
  27. Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu