BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Nový Michal (Masaryk University)
The Higher Principle? : An Attempt to Develop a Near Universal Approach to Explaining Voter Turnout through Micro-Macro Interactions
Polish Sociological Review, 2016, nr 1, s. 87-100, tab., rys., bibliogr. 50 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Decyzje wyborcze, Interakcje społeczne, Teorie socjologiczne
Voting decisions, Social interaction, Sociological theories
Over the past decade, several authors have tried to explain why people participate in elections by examining both direct and contingent effects of diverse sets of factors. While the direct effects follow a simple logic that some independent variable directly affects turnout, contingent effects work on the assumption that the influence of one explanatory variable differs across varying levels of another explanatory variable. In the previous research, the existence of latter effects has been justified on the basis of more or less convincing stories. An attempt is made here to provide a more general framework, stemming from the question, "At what moment do representative democracies achieve political equality?" From this starting point, the article introduces a near universal approach for understanding contingent effects in voter turnout theory and for developing various hypotheses that may be tested using multilevel models that include cross-level interaction.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
  1. Anderson, C. 2007. The Interaction of Structures and Voting Behavior, in: R. Dalton, H. Klingemann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 589-609.
  2. Anduiza Perea, E. 2002. Individual Characteristics, Institutional Incentives and Electoral Abstention in Western Europe, European Journal of Political Research 41 (5): 643-672.
  3. Armingeon, K., Schädel, L. 2015. Social Inequality in Political Participation: The Dark Sides of Individualisation, West European Politics 38 (1): 1-27.
  4. Bernhagen, P., Marsh, M. 2007. Voting and Protesting: Explaining Citizen Participation in Old and New European Democracies, Democratization 14 (1): 44-72.
  5. Birch, S. 2010. Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout, Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1601-1622.
  6. Bühlmann, M., Freitag, M. 2006. Individual and Contextual Determinants of Electoral Participation, Swiss Political Science Review 12 (4): 13-47.
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., Stokes, D. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Carreras, M., Castaneda-Angarita, N. 2013. Who Votes in Latin America? A Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives, Comparative Political Studies XX (X): 1-26.
  9. Chen, T. 2011. Uncovering the micro-foundations of turnout and electoral systems, Electoral Studies 30 (2): 295-308.
  10. Cox, G. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Cutts, D.,Fieldhouse, E. 2009. What Small Spatial Scales are Relevant as Electoral Contexts for Individual Voters? The Importance of the Household on Turnout at the 2001 General Election, American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 726-739.
  12. Dalton, R., Anderson, C. 2011. Citizens, Context, and Choice, in: R. Dalton, C. Anderson (eds.), Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens' Electoral Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-30.
  13. Enos, R., Fowler, A., Vavreck, L. 2014. Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate, Journal of Politics 76 (1): 273-288.
  14. Evans, J. 2004. Voters and Voting: An Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
  15. Fieldhouse, E., Tranmer, M., Russell, A. 2007. Something about Young People or Something about Elections? Electoral Participation of Young People in Europe: Evidence from a Multilevel Analysis of the European Social Survey, European Journal of Political Research 46 (6): 797-822.
  16. Flavin, P. 2012. Does Higher Voter Turnout among the Poor lead to more Equal Policy Representation?, Social Science Journal 49 (4): 405-412.
  17. Franklin, M. 2002. The Dynamics of Electoral Participation, in: L. LeDuc, R. Niemi, P. Norris (eds.), Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting. London: Sage Publications, pp.148-168.
  18. Franzese, R., Kam, C. 2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  19. Freitag, M.,Stadelmann-Steffen, I. 2010. Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? The Influence of Direct Democracy on Individual Participation in Parliamentary Elections, Electoral Studies 29 (3): 472-483.
  20. Gallego, A. 2010. Understanding Unequal Turnout: Education and Voting in Comparative Perspective, Electoral Studies 29 (2): 239-248.
  21. Geys, B. 2006. Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research, Electoral Studies 25 (4): 637-663.
  22. Hadjar, A., Beck, M. 2010. Who does not participate in elections in Europe and why is this?, European Societies 12 (4): 521-542.
  23. Highton, B., Wolfinger, R. 2001. The Political Implications of Higher Turnout, British Journal of Political Science31 (1): 179-192
  24. Jacobs, K., Spierings, N. 2010. District Magnitude and Voter Turnout a Multi-level Analysis of Self-reported Voting in the 32 Dominican Republic Districts, Electoral Studies 29 (4): 704-718.
  25. Jackman, R. 1987. Political Institutions and Voter turnout in the Industrial Democracies, American Political Science Review 81 (2): 405-423.
  26. Jusko, K., Shively, W. 2005. Applying a Two-Step Strategy to the Analysis of Cross-National Public Opinion Data, Political Analysis 13 (4): 327-344.
  27. Kittilson, M., Anderson, C. 2011. Electoral Supply and Voter Engagement, in: R. Dalton, C. Anderson (eds.), Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens' Electoral Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33-54.
  28. Kostadinova, T. 2003. Voter turnout Dynamics in Post-communist Europe, European Journal of Political Research 42 (6): 741-759.
  29. Lazarsfeld, P.,Berelson, B.,Gaudet, H. 1948. The People 's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
  30. Lijphart, A. 1997. Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma, American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1-14.
  31. Norris, P. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Nový, M. 2013. Volební účast a její determinanty ve starych a nových demokraciích Evropy, Slovak Sociological Review 45 (2): 195-228.
  33. Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Pacheco, J. 2008. Political Socialization in Context: The Effect of Political Competition on Youth Voter Turnout, Political Behavior 30 (4): 415-436.
  35. Persson, M., Solevid, M., Öhrvall, R. 2013. Voter Turnout and Political Equality: Testing the Law of Dispersion in a Swedish Natural Experiment, Politics 33 (3): 172-184.
  36. Quintelier, E.,Hooghe, M.,Marien, S. 2011. The Effect of Compulsory Voting on Turnout Stratification Patterns: A Cross-national Analysis, International Political Science Review 32 (4): 396-416.
  37. Reif, K., Schmitt , H. 1980. Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results, European Journal of Political Research 8(1): 3-44.
  38. Rocha, R., Tolbert, C., Bowen, D., Clark, C. 2010. Race and Turnout: Does Descriptive Representation in State Legislatures Increase Minority Voting?, Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 890-907.
  39. Rosema, M. 2007. Low turnout: Threat to democracy or blessing in disguise? Consequences of citizens' varying tendencies to vote, Electoral Studies 26 (3): 612-623.
  40. Rosenstone, S., Hansen, J. 2003. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Longman.
  41. Schattschneider, E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Austin: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  42. Schlozman, K., Verba, S., Brady, H. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  43. Sinnott, R., Achen, C. 2008. Voter Dropoff in Low Salience Elections. Online: [accessed: 07.11.2014].
  44. Singh, S. 2011a. Contradictory Calculi: Differences in Individuals' Turnout Decisions across Electoral Systems, Political Research Quarterly 64 (3): 646-655.
  45. Singh, S. 2011b. How Compelling is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout, Political Behavior 33 (1): 95-111.
  46. Söderlund, P., Wass, H., Blais, A. 2011. The impact of motivational and contextual factors on turnout in first- and second-order elections, Electoral Studies 30 (4): 689-699.
  47. Tingsten, H. 1937. Political Behaviour: Studies in Election Statistics. London: P. S. King & Son.
  48. Topf, R. 1995. Electoral Participation, in: H. Klingemann, D. Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27-51.
  49. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., Brady, H. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  50. Wolfinger, R., Rosenstone, S. 1980. Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu