BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Franczak Karol (University of Łódź)
Tytuł
The Circulation of Knowledge in Public Discourse-Between 'Popularization' and 'Populization'
Źródło
Polish Sociological Review, 2016, nr 1, s. 19-32, tab., bibliogr. 38 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Teoria wiedzy, Dziennikarstwo, Analiza dyskursu
Theory of knowledge, Journalism, Discourse analysis
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
The main objective of this paper is to investigate the circulation of knowledge in public discourse. Two models of circulation, which could be called the 'popularization' and 'populization' of knowledge, are discussed. The first is identified with the traditional activity of academic elites and usually involves informing the general public about scientific discoveries and translating hermetic academic jargon into language accessible to a wider audience. The second attempts to describe the process whereby the dominant administrators of scientific knowledge lose their monopoly position. An especially valuable proposal for describing 'popularization' and 'populization' is the category of 'de-distantiation' (the reduction and weakening of distances in social relations) invented by Karl Mannheim. The circulation of knowledge is also considered as an important component of modernization and anti-modernization discourse.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Aupers, S. 2012. 'Trust no one': Modernization, Paranoia and Conspiracy Culture, European Journal of Communication 27(1): 22-34.
  2. Bachmann-Medick, D. 2006. Cultural Turns. Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlts Taschenbuch Verlag.
  3. Bensaude-Vincent, B. 2001. A Genealogy of the Increasing Gap Between Science and the Public, Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 99-113.
  4. Calsamiglia, H. and Van Dijk, T. A. 2004. Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about Genome, Discourse & Society 15(4): 369-389.
  5. Ciapuscio, G. E. 2003. Formulation and Reformulation Procedures in Verbal Interactions between Experts and (Semi-) Laypersons, Discourse Studies 5(2): 207-233.
  6. Collins, H. 2014. Rejecting Knowledge Claims Inside and Outside Science, Social Studies of Science 44(5): 722-735.
  7. Czyżewski, M. 2012. Socjologia wobec kultury - uwagi na marginesie koncepcji Antoniny Kłoskowskiej, Przegląd Socjologiczny LXI(3): 67-89.
  8. Czyżewski, M. 2013. W kręgu społecznej pedagogii, Societas/Communitas 2(16): 43-73.
  9. Depaepe, M., Herman,F., Surmont, M.,van Gorp, A. and Simon, F. 2008. About Pedagogization: From Perspective of the History of Education, Educational Research 3: 13-30.
  10. Depaepe, M. and Smeyers, P. 2008. Educationalization as Ongoing Modernization Process, Educational Theory 58(4): 379-389.
  11. Foucault, M. 1988. Technologies of the Self, in: L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, P. H. Hutton, Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock, pp. 16-49.
  12. Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Fuchs, M. 2009. Reaching Out; or, Nobody Exists in one Context only: Society as Translation, Translation Studies 2(1): 21-40.
  14. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE.
  15. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  16. Gülich, E. 2003. Conversational Techniques Used in Transferring Knowledge Between Medical Experts and Non-experts, Discourse Studies 5(2): 235-263.
  17. Gwóźdź, A. (ed.). 2010. Od przemysłów kultury do kreatywnej gospodarki. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
  18. Hanisch, C. 1970. The Personal is Political, in: S. Firestone, A. Koedt (eds.), Notes From the Second Year: Women's Liberation. Major Writings of the Radical Feminists. New York: Radical Feminism.
  19. Henderson, D. 1986. Innocence and Design: The Influence of Economic Ideas on Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  20. Hilgartner, S. 1990. The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses, Social Studies of Science 20(3): 519-539.
  21. Illouz, E. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. London: Polity Press.
  22. Illouz, E. 2008. Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley. Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  23. Jemielniak, D. and Koźmiński, A. K. 2008. Zarządzanie wiedzą. Warszawa: WAiP.
  24. Lash, Ch. 1979. The Culture of Narcissism. American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: W.W. Norton.
  25. Lehmkuhl, M., Karamanidou, Ch., Mörä, T., Petkova, K. and Trench, B. 2012. Scheduling Science on Television: A Comparative Analysis of the Representations of Science in 11 European Countries, Public Understanding of Science 21(8): 1002-1018.
  26. Mannheim, K. 1956. Essays on the Sociology of Culture. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
  27. Musiał, M. 2013. Richard Sennett and Eva Illouz on Tyranny of Intimacy. Intimacy Tyrannized and Intimacy as a Tyrant, Lingua ac Communitas 23: 119-133.
  28. Myers, G. 2003. Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries, Discourse Studies 5(2): 265-279.
  29. Petersen, I., Heinrichs, H., and Peters, H. P. 2010. Mass-Mediated Expertise as Informal Policy Advice, Science, Technology & Human Values 35(6): 865-887.
  30. Rafter, K. 2014. Voices in the Crisis. The Role of Media Elites in Interpreting Irland's Banking Collapse, European Journal of Communication 29(5): 598-607.
  31. Rakus, D. 2009. Mit powszechnej kompetencji jako element dyskursu dominującego, Media - Kultura -Społeczeństwo 4: 107-120.
  32. Rose, N. 1998. Inventing Our Selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Rosen, Ch. 2007. Virtual Friendship and the New Narcissism, The New Atlantis 17: 15-31.
  34. Sennett, R. 1977. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.
  35. Snell-Hornby, M. 2009. What's in a Turn? On Fits, Starts and Writhings in Recent Translation Studies, Translation Studies 2(1): 41-51.
  36. Thussu, D. K. 2007. News as Entertainment. The Rise of Global Infotainment. London: Sage.
  37. Znaniecki, F. 1984. Społeczne role uczonych. Warszawa: PWN.
  38. Zoonen van, L. 2012. I-Pistemology: Changing Truth Claims in Popular and Political Culture, European Journal of Communication 27(1): 56-67.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1231-1413
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu