BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Żemigała Marcin (Uniwersytet Warszawski)
Title
Application of Social Responsibility Standards in Poland and the World
Source
Ekonomia i Prawo, 2017, t. 16, nr 2, s. 229-240, tab., rys., bibliogr. 24 poz.
Economics and Law
Keyword
Społeczna odpowiedzialność, Normy ISO 14001, Standardy
Social Responsibility, ISO 14001, Standards
Note
JEL Classification: M14, M16
summ.
Abstract
Motivation: Social responsibility (SR) is a management concept that is similar to quality management and environmental management. Like every concept, it has a set of tools that can be implemented in organizations that need to use the concept in their activities. Currently, the SR tool catalog is being modified and keeps growing. Two research questions were stated: (1) How does the use of SR standards look like in the world according to current data? (2) How does the use of SR standards look like in individual countries and in Poland according to current data? Aim: The purpose of this article is to analyze the use of standardized SR tools. The essence of SR was first approximated and a set of standardized tools was characterized. The state of their application was analyzed empirically. Results: The most commonly used SR standard is ISO 14001, the others are less commonly used. On the one hand, it is comforting that a voluntary environmental norm is relatively common; on the other hand, it is surprising that tools from other spheres (working conditions, sustainability reporting and stakeholder relations) have little use. With regard to the use of standardized SR tools in different countries, there is a strong tendency among non-developed and stable economies to use these tools, which demonstrates their greater motivation to improve competitiveness with the use of SR. Unfortunately, in Poland this trend does not exist and the analyzed standards are practically not used, except for ISO 14001. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. AccountAbility. (2008a). AA 1000 accountability principles standard. Retrieved 02.05.2017 from http://www.accountability.org.
  2. AccountAbility. (2008b). AA 1000 assurance standard. Retrieved 02.05.2017 from http://www.accountability.org.
  3. AccountAbility. (2015a). AA1000 stakeholder engagement standard. Retrieved 02.05.2017 from http://www.accountability.org.
  4. AccountAbility. (2015b). Retrieved 02.05.2017 from: http://www.accountability.org.
  5. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three - dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4). doi:10.2307/257850.
  6. Chrisman, J.J., & Archer, R.W. (1984). Small business social responsibility: some perceptions and in-sights. American Journal of Small Business, 9(2).
  7. Enticott, G., & Walker, R.M. (2008). Sustainability, performance and organizational strategy: an empirical analysis of public organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2). doi:10.1002/bse.501.
  8. Fischer, W.A., & Groenveld, L. (1978). Social responsibility and small business. Journal of Small Busi-ness Management, 14(1).
  9. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
  10. Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and 'the corporate objective revis-ited'. Organization Science, 15(3). doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066.
  11. GRI. (2016a). Retrieved 02.05.2017 from: https://www.globalreporting.org/services/Analysis/Reports_List/Pages/default.aspx.
  12. GRI. (2016b). Wytyczne do raportowania. Retrieved 02.05.2017 from http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl.
  13. Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: what can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3). doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039418.75103.ed.
  14. ISO. (2014). Retrieved 02.05.2017 from: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-survey.
  15. Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3). doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6.
  16. PKN. (2012). Wytyczne dotyczące społecznej odpowiedzialności (PN-ISO 26000). Retrieved 02.05.2017 from https://www.pkn.pl.
  17. PKN. (2015). Systemy zarządzania środowiskowego. Wymagania i wytyczne stosowania (PN-EN ISO 14001:2015). Retrieved 02.05.2017 from https://www.pkn.pl.
  18. Porter, M.E. &, Kramer, M.R. (2004). Strategy and society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12).
  19. Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2). doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0079-z.
  20. SAI. (2008). Social accountability 8000. Retrieved 02.05.2017 from http://www.sa-intl.org.
  21. Social Accountability Accreditation Services. (2016). Retrieved 02.05.2017 from: www.saasaccreditation.org/sites/default/files/u4/Q1_2016_SAAS_SA8000_public_list.xlsx.
  22. Schwartz, M.S., & Carroll, A.B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4).
  23. Wilson, E. (1980). Social responsibility of business: what are the small business perspectives? Journal of Small Business Management, 3.
  24. Żemigała, M. (2013). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w świetle analiz bibliometrycznych i opinii pracowników na temat równowagi między życiem zawodowym a prywatnym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1898-2255
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2017.016
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu