BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Odrobina Anna (Cracow University of Economics, Poland / Kolegium Ekonomii, Finansów i Prawa)
Structural Barriers to Research and Development Activities in Emerging Markets : The Case of Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary
Economics and Business Review, 2016, vol. 2 (16), nr 2, s. 39-53, tab.,wykr., bibliogr. 42 poz.
Polityka badawczo-rozwojowa, Rynki wschodzące, Dynamika rozwoju regionalnego
R&D policy, Emerging markets, Regional development dynamics
Polska, Czechy, Węgry
Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary
The paper discusses the structural barriers to R&D in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, emerging markets striving to build economies based on innovation and knowledge. In reality research and development in the above countries suffer from some structural faults including: deficiency in R&D investments, ineffective structure based on government funding and insufficient engagement of business in financing and implementation of R&D. (original abstract)
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Full text
  1. Balcerzak, A.P., 2015, Europe 2020 Strategy and Structural Diversity between Old and New Member States. Application of Zero Unitarization Method for Dynamic Analysis in the Years 2004-2013, Economics and Sociology, vol. 8, no. 2: 190-210.
  2. Balcerzak, A.P., Pietrzak, M.B., 2016, Structural Equation Model in Evaluation of Technological Potential of European Union Countries in the years 2008-2012, Institute of Economic Research Working Papers, no. 6, Toruń.
  3. Bartha, Z., Gubik, A.S., 2014, Specifics of International Business Competitiveness in Visegrad Countries - Qualitative Analysis of Selected Case Studies, in: Kiendl- Wendner, D., Wach, K. (eds.), Patterns of Business Internationalisation in Visegrad Countries - in Search for Regional Specifics, Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena, Cartagena: 127-159.
  4. Bočkova, N., 2013, Visegrad Four Countries: Evaluation in R&D Sectors of Performance, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, LXI, no.4: 873-880.
  5. Buckley, P.J., Hashai, N., 2014, The Role of Technological Catch up and Domestic Market Growth in the Genesis of Emerging Country Based Multinationals, Research Policy,no. 43: 423-437.
  6. Daszkiewicz, N., Olczyk, M., 2014, Competitiveness of the Visegrad Countries - Paths for Competitiveness Growth, in: Kiendl-Wendner, D., Wach, K. (eds.), International Competitiveness in Visegrad Countries: Macro and Micro Perspectives. Fachhochschule Joanneum, Graz: 33-52.
  7. European Commission, 2010, Europe 2020 - A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, COM(2010) 546, European Commission, Brussels.
  8. European Commission, 2011, Science, Technology and Innovation in Europe, European Union, Luxembourg.
  9. European Commission, 2012, The 2012 EU Survey on R&D Investment Business Trends, European Communities, Luxembourg.
  10. European Commission, 2013a, Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013, European Union, Brussels.
  11. European Commission, 2013b, EU R&D Scoreboard. The 2013 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard, European Union, Luxembourg.
  12. European Commission, 2015a, 2014 Ranking World top 2500 companies, [access: 10.09.2015].
  13. European Commission, 2015b, Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015, European Union, Brussels.
  14. European Union, 2015, IUS database, [access: 15.09.2015].
  15. Eurostat, 2012, Europe 2020 Strategy - towards a Smarter, Greener and More Inclusive EU Economy?, Statistics in Focus, no. 39. 52 Economics and Business Review, Vol. 2 (16), No. 2, 2016.
  16. Eurostat, 2013, Science, Technology and Innovation in Europe. 2013 edition, European Union, Luxembourg.
  17. Gardocka-Jałowiec, A., 2012, Nakłady na działalność badawczo-rozwojową a innowacyjność polskiej gospodarki, Ekonomista, nr 1: 79-99.
  18. Gokhberg, L., 2012, The Transformation of R&D in the Post-Socialist Countries: Patterns and Trends, in: Dyker, D.A., Radosevic, S., Innovation and Structural Change in Post-Socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach, Springer, London, vol. 20: 153-172.
  19. Golejewska, A., 2013, Competitiveness, Innovation and Regional Development. The Case of the Visegrad Group Countries, Gospodarka Narodowa, nr 7-8 (263-264): 87-112.
  20. Golejewska, A., 2014, Innowacyjność input-output regionow grupy wyszehradzkiej, Oeconomia Copernicana, no. 1: 61-78.
  21. Holzl, W., Janger, J., 2014, Distance to the Frontier and the Perception Innovation Barriers across European Countries, Research Policy, no. 43: 707-725.
  22. Hudec, O., Prochadzkova, M., 2015, Visegrad Countries and Regions: Innovation Performance and Efficiency, Quality Innovation Prosperity, no. 19/2: 55-72.
  23. Huňady, J., Orviska, M., Šarkanova, B., 2014, Determinants of European Firm's Innovation and the Role of Public Financial Support, European Financial and Accounting Journal,vol. 9, iss. 1: 62-84.
  24. Kaposzta, J., Nagy, H., 2015, Status Report about The Progress of The Visegrad Countries in Relation To Europe 2020 Targets, European Spatial Research Policy, no. 1, vol. 22:81-99.
  25. Kilar, W., 2014, Differentiation of Visegrad Group International Corporations in Comparison to World's Largest Corporations, in: Kiendl-Wendner, D., Wach, K. (eds.),International Competitiveness in Visegrad Countries: Macro and Micro Perspective,Fachhochschule Joanneum, Graz: 171-186.
  26. Krajewski, S., 2014, Innovation Levels in The Economies of Central and Eastern Europe, Comparative Economic Research, vol. 17, no. 3: 101-122.
  27. Meske, W. (ed.), 2004, From System Transformation to European Integration. Science and Technology in Central and Eastern Europe at the Beginning of the 21th Century, Lit Verlag, Munster.
  28. MSZ RP, 2015, Grupa Wyszehradzka, [access: 09.09.2015].
  29. OECD, 2008, The Internationalization of Business R&D. Evidence, Impacts and Implications, OECD, Paris.
  30. OECD, 2012, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  31. OECD, 2014, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  32. OECD, 2015a, Science, Technology and R&D Statistics, database, < technology/data/oecd-science-technology-and-r-d-statistics_strd-data-en > [access: 10.09.2015].
  33. OECD, 2015b, Statistics on Measuring Globalisation, database, [access: 15.09.2015].
  34. Owczarczuk, M., 2013, Government Incentives and FDI into R&D. The Case of Visegrad Countries, Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, no. 1(2):73-86.
  35. Piekut, M., Pacian, J., 2013, Przestrzenne zrożnicowanie nakładow na działalność badawczorozwojową na przełomie wiekow, Economics and Management, no. 4: 205-224.
  36. Piekut, M., 2013, Innowacyjność krajow Unii Europejskiej, Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, nr 3: 73-80.
  37. Podwysocka, A., 2015, Nakłady na działalność badawczo-rozwojową w Polsce w latach 2000-2012 na tle wybranych krajow Unii Europejskiej, Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici, Zarządzanie XlII - no. 1: 11-20.
  38. Sierotowicz, T., 2015, Patent Activity as an Effect of the Research and Development of the Business Enterprise Sectors in the Countries of the European Union, Journal of International Studies, vol. 8, no. 2: 101-113.
  39. Tomaszewski, M., 2014, Outsourcing and Innovative Activity of the Companies from the Visegrad Group, Chinese Business Review, vol. 13, no. 6: 399-409.
  40. UNCTAD, 2011, Foreign Direct Investment, the Transfer and Diffusion of Technology, and Sustainable Development, UNCTAD, Geneva.
  41. Visegrad Group, 2015,< > [access: 09.09.2015].
  42., 2010, Visegrad Countries on Road towards Knowledge Society, [access: 12.09.2014].
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu